It 's news of a few minutes ago: three Google executives were convicted by the Criminal Court of Milan for invasion of privacy under the notorious case "Vividown" concerning the publication of a video showing a child with Down syndrome and insulted beaten by four students .
Still do not have the written judgment, it was not until a few months , but we must not wait to start worrying about for the moment that is passing through the Network of Italian bills inadequate (just think of the Decree Romans and all ' obligation to correct for blog in the coming weeks could pass under the wiretaps called DDL) and questionable judicial rulings (the new seizure of The Pirate Bay , the ruling on the case-Mediaset Youtube and, indeed, the judgment Vividown).
(Picture of De Balie )
They are worse than the laws or judgments?
Undoubtedly, at this time, the law is not an ally of the technology in our country, not the fault of the legislature or the courts ... rules and judgments are the faithful mirror of our society backward and tecnofoba.
The right resource and should be, instead, is turning into a huge obstacle to development comes to mind that passage of Faust where Goethe wrote "Laws and rights are inherited as an eternal condition. It strascinano from one generation to another. They propagate from place to place, slowly. The reason becomes nonsense, the public benefit a calamity which misfortune to be a descendant! "
All those who care about innovation in our country are called upon to roll up their sleeves to reverse the trend. Where do we start?
Social comments and analytics for this post ...
This post was by diritto2punto0 Mentioned on Twitter: New blog post: Houston, we have a problem: Google ordered to "Vividown case" .. http://bit.ly/cZADdh .
[...] Fact, which have just given the news magazines, talk about it already Massimo, Ernesto, Methylparaben and others. There is therefore worthwhile to dwell on the description of the circumstances, [...]
[...] In particular in our country, which shines with ability to support regulatory € ™ innovation. [...]
[...] Quite a reaction on Italian blogs. There 's one who sees a monster in the judgment of Milan for the extension of the legal liability of the operator loads the page on which [...]
Good question ... where do we start? How can you avoid the abyss that lies ahead with this before?
Bah ... I think the judgment that Google hits, though disturbing, represents, however, a borderline case.
Do not forget that the judiciary will soon be subject to reform. And I do not know what it is also desirable, however.
For me, the pressure against the net ... it's so clear where they come from, that the debate on the net, it seems even superfluous.
It's not in blog or on the internet that we should ask these questions, I'm afraid.
On this side of the fence we all already agree.
I dream of a different country, but the fault is not (only) of those who administer ... even the ruling class is the mirror of a people and their way of seeing things, at the back.
I deal in my blog about films and I had to tell what are the keywords they access, many users, to my blog, do not stupiresti much
From my point of view, to answer your question, the laws should be stopped.
Some zealous district court, I fear, will happen even in the presence of laws in favor of the internet, but to limit, for other interests, the free flow of information on the web, a right that is now, as it were, in fact acquired, and all effects, is an action that we must fight at all costs and by all means possible, because behind a reprimand of this sort would reduce to zero, a stroke, a condition for the development of the country and also of its democracy.
With estimates.
Rob.
After the reactions of Google, and the position taken by the U.S. against the sentence which condemns the three managers of the U.S., are cautiously optimistic.
It seems to me that the striking example of this will help each other, paradoxically, the cause of the conflict with the laws restricting freedom of information on the Internet.
At least that's my hope.
With estimates.
Mah.
Dear Ernesto, the court anticipates that the legislature has not yet issued. Davevro This is a huge mistake!
[...] Read on many blogs, Â the different positions of the various Italian bloggers on the case Vividown and Google. Some guys publish [...]
[...] I'm glad also known as Ernesto certain judgments, in fact anticipate legislation in progress. But they were all togas [...]
[...] The news of recent weeks, the legal profiles linked to the Web are still highly topical. The increased popularity of the info-telematic technologies poses, in fact, important [...]