Many protests have been aimed at avoiding that rule was finally approved and the month of July was held the first "blog strike" , an initiative aimed at raising public awareness of this provision restricts freedoms.
However, months later, the so-called "duty of adjustment for computer sites" was not deleted from the text that the Senate is about to approve in the coming days.
A last attempt to avoid this rule becomes infamous law was promoted, in the form of appeal, by prof.Stefano Rodotà and other scholars (including friends Guido Scorza and Arturo Di Corinto).
In the Senate the majority seeks to impose the law on wiretapping that would undermine the essential aspects of the constitutional system.
Am I at risk the freedom of expression and the right of citizens to be informed.
Not all crimes can be investigated through wiretaps and is substantially prevented the publication of interceptions carried out
A heavy fall censorship on information.Also on amateur blogs.
If that law had been in force, we would not have had any good news about the real estate business and those of the Minister Scajola bank Consort.
If the law is approved, the judiciary can no longer act effectively on illegalities and scandals such as those disclosed in the health and finance, will not take serious crimes.
He says he wants to protect privacy: a legitimate objective, but it can be achieved without violating the principles and rights.
It wants, in fact, impose a dangerous secret and opaque regime.
The constitutional freedoms are not available for any majority.
Long ago, in July of 2009, when there was a day of silence of the blog I wrote some proposals to 'circumvent' the bill. Those proposals could still be valid?
[...] And then, of constitutional intervention would be more than desirable given the recent history, marked by a veritable "technological obscurantism" that marked the last legislature (without distinction between different political parties). The coverage of the constitutional issues such as access to the Internet and freedom of expression, for example, might speed up some processes (such as the spread of broadband) and avoid others (think of all the measures cc.dd. "kill- blog "as the obligation to rectify Alfano DDL). [...]
and I'm going to join and diffuse
Ditto ...
Long ago, in July of 2009, when there was a day of silence of the blog I wrote some proposals to 'circumvent' the bill. Those proposals could still be valid?
http://cosechedimentico.blogspot.com/2009/07/le-ragioni-del-silenzio.html
[...] And then, of constitutional intervention would be more than desirable given the recent history, marked by a veritable "technological obscurantism" that marked the last legislature (without distinction between different political parties). The coverage of the constitutional issues such as access to the Internet and freedom of expression, for example, might speed up some processes (such as the spread of broadband) and avoid others (think of all the measures cc.dd. "kill- blog "as the obligation to rectify Alfano DDL). [...]